Understanding Bills, and how to respond to them (Also: who is working behind the scenes... more on the Government House Leader & the Privy Council Office.)
The reason we cannot get our message out to the general public is because each of us works alone with no numbers, no resources, no reach and no muscle. In Canada, there are thousands of us and we compete against each other, each trying to get our own voice heard over the noise of all of us talking at the same time. The effect is we drown each other out and none of our voices are heard.
Everyone is talking but no one is listening.
We...must...unite. But, we are not united and we are not uniting. If we can't or don't unite then we lose this global war.
I suspect that there are actually many listening; the problem is that they know their isolated voice is for the most part effectively useless, a realisation that results in considerable bystander apathy. Consequently, I completely agree that without unification little, if anything, will be accomplished and much will be lost. It seems that the immediate need is creating a means of easily facilitating that process, not just between individuals, but also among groups that are trying to outcompete each other regardless of having similar objectives. That raises the question: any ideas how greater unification might be achieved?
The big problem is that those who are doing all the talking, our de-facto leaders in the "𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘰𝘮 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵", literally have no interest in uniting. We have observed this clear rejection of unity for the past 3 years.
The ONLY way we little people can win this global war is if we eliminate the Cabal and it's global network. The ONLY way we can eliminate the Cabal is if we unite. If we can't or don't unite, if we can't or don't eliminate the Cabal then the ONLY conlusion is we lose this global war. Conceptually, this is very simple.
We face a real existential crisis where our lives are literally at stake. You would think that was sufficient motivation to get our de facto leaders in the "𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘰𝘮 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵" to unite. Conspicuously, every one of them refuses to unite and refuses to even talk about our unity. Each of them has prioritized their petty turf war, ego and echo chamber with the effect that, "𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨".
This will only change when our rank-and-file start to hold our de facto leaders to account and demand our leaders explain why they refuse to commit to the only course of action that can win this war for us, unity with our large scale numbers.
BTW, I do have a proposal of how to unify us (see https://www.virusfraud.org/winning-this-war/). I sent it out to about 240 of our prominent groups and leaders over a year ago. The response I got was....crickets.
John Spritlzer in the US (see https://www.pdrboston.org/) has just started trying to do what you have suggested. I estimate it will take at least 6 months before we get an idea of what progress he can make. John's intentions are good but I'm not hopeful.
Ted Kuntz is a good example of our de-facto leaders in Canada. Mark Trozzi is another. Both are very well connected across Canada and yet neither even whispers about uniting our rank-and-file. Kuntz and Trozzi are preoccupied with their petty turf wars (e.g. NCI, VCC) that will predicatably achieve little and go nowhere. Very simply, Kuntz and Trozzi have no numbers, no resources, no reach and no muscle.
The Cabal has been around for at least a 1000 years. What that means is we little people have lost every round to the Cabal over the past 1000 years. Let the implications of that sink in with regards to what we are NOT doing now.
The purpose of this post is to educate those who do not yet know about the legislative process , about how it works and where they can find out more about the bills before Parliament. It is written to encourage journalists and news followers to take the next step when it comes to their duty as citizens to provide feedback and direction to lawmakers - given officials are supposed to be elected to represent citizens. This is not the best spot to discuss strategic planning among citizen groups who are already informed about how bills are turned into laws. What is not helpful is naming and shaming those citizen action group leaders who are working hard at what they see as a gap in the Canadian citizen rights/freedoms/health movement. While Ian has a point, that together Canadians can have more impact working for change than alone, insisting that leaders of existing groups drop everything to create a street army and naming/shaming those who are staying within their domain of expertise is polarizing instead of unifying. Too many Canadians recall with horror how brutally the federal government clamped down on participants in the Trucker Convoy in 2022, and how many other times the governent uses state force to push out any forms of economic competition. https://canadianshareablenews.substack.com/p/health-canadas-history-of-using-state. Just having seen the actions of the CFIA has been chllling as well. Currently, various individals report that their communication is already being surveillled as is. Imagine the reaction of surveiallance crews were to catch wind of a "street army" being organized. If any leaders were to publically try to organize some kind of resistance that would be seen as a threat to state power, they risk being rendered unable to continue in the valuable work they are currently already doing, for example realted to health freedoms. It would appear that resistance to the global technocratic state is occuring underground, not as much in the open as recommended by Ian here: https://www.virusfraud.org/winning-this-war-part-4/. Note to new readers of this post: Who would have thought, back in the 1980s when the Soviet Union was a poster child for totalitarianism that only 40 years later it is many of the so-called "free Western democracies" in which citizens are discussing how to respond to increasingly totalitarian state actions. See posts entitled "CSNews Guide to Globalsits" here: https://canadianshareablenews.substack.com. And follow ByGeorgeJournal on Substack as Niagara journalist Chris George provides key backgroud information for consideration.
There is so much that is incorrect about your response here. I'll address a few of the points.
1) Your objective with this blog post and your substack account is admirable but futile. What is your strategy(ies), metric(s) and result(s) for reaching that objective? What is your strategy for reaching “𝘫𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘴”, what are you metrics for tracking whether or not you are making any progress, what results do you realistically expect and when will you report your results? It is reasonable to assume you have not defined them. In addition, you have no numbers, no resources, no reach and no muscle. You are competing against, and drowned out, by all our other people/groups that are clamouring to get their voices heard.
2) You wrote, “𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘤 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨”. We are not talking about strategic planning. We are only talking about the fact that we must unite to win this global war but that our de-facto leaders are NOT interested in uniting us. By the way, where do you suggest we go to talk about uniting, especially since that topic is avoided like the plague by all our de-facto leaders?
3) You wrote, “𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘱 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴...”. We are in a global war and the only way we can win this war is if we unite. Given people like Ted and Mark never even talk about uniting us or our rank-and-file then how is that suddenly a case of naming-and-shaming them? This is simply a fact. Ted and Mark, like all our de-facto leaders, have no numbers, no resources, no reach and no muscle. This too is a fact. If facts are now considered “𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨-𝘢𝘯𝘥-𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨” then we have a problem.
4) You wrote, “...𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘥𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨”. There isn’t a single person or group in Canada that is trying to unite us across Canada, let alone the world. This is the huge elephant-in-the-room point/problem that is being willfully ignored!!! If we can’t or don’t unite the everything we are doing is meaningless and pointless. To be clear, that means everything people (like Ted, Mark, you and I) are doing is meaningless and pointless.
5) You wrote, “𝘐𝘧 𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳...” That is the ONLY way we are going to be able to organize – in full public view. There is no “𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥” resistance for the simple reason the ONLY way to win this war is to unite, organize and mobilize millions of people across Canada and billions across the world and that can NEVER happen in “𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘺”. It is absurd to suggest otherwise.
6) Why am I having this discussion in this open public forum? The answer is because this is the only place where I can have these discussions, that is, until I am blocked from commenting.
https://youtu.be/DFTsd042M3o very important for all to reas. bobby martin
Everyone is talking but no one is listening.
The reason we cannot get our message out to the general public is because each of us works alone with no numbers, no resources, no reach and no muscle. In Canada, there are thousands of us and we compete against each other, each trying to get our own voice heard over the noise of all of us talking at the same time. The effect is we drown each other out and none of our voices are heard.
Everyone is talking but no one is listening.
We...must...unite. But, we are not united and we are not uniting. If we can't or don't unite then we lose this global war.
Ian Bell
www.virusfraud.org
I suspect that there are actually many listening; the problem is that they know their isolated voice is for the most part effectively useless, a realisation that results in considerable bystander apathy. Consequently, I completely agree that without unification little, if anything, will be accomplished and much will be lost. It seems that the immediate need is creating a means of easily facilitating that process, not just between individuals, but also among groups that are trying to outcompete each other regardless of having similar objectives. That raises the question: any ideas how greater unification might be achieved?
The big problem is that those who are doing all the talking, our de-facto leaders in the "𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘰𝘮 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵", literally have no interest in uniting. We have observed this clear rejection of unity for the past 3 years.
The ONLY way we little people can win this global war is if we eliminate the Cabal and it's global network. The ONLY way we can eliminate the Cabal is if we unite. If we can't or don't unite, if we can't or don't eliminate the Cabal then the ONLY conlusion is we lose this global war. Conceptually, this is very simple.
We face a real existential crisis where our lives are literally at stake. You would think that was sufficient motivation to get our de facto leaders in the "𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘰𝘮 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵" to unite. Conspicuously, every one of them refuses to unite and refuses to even talk about our unity. Each of them has prioritized their petty turf war, ego and echo chamber with the effect that, "𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨".
This will only change when our rank-and-file start to hold our de facto leaders to account and demand our leaders explain why they refuse to commit to the only course of action that can win this war for us, unity with our large scale numbers.
BTW, I do have a proposal of how to unify us (see https://www.virusfraud.org/winning-this-war/). I sent it out to about 240 of our prominent groups and leaders over a year ago. The response I got was....crickets.
Ian Bell
www.virusfraud.org
John Spritlzer in the US (see https://www.pdrboston.org/) has just started trying to do what you have suggested. I estimate it will take at least 6 months before we get an idea of what progress he can make. John's intentions are good but I'm not hopeful.
Ted Kuntz is a good example of our de-facto leaders in Canada. Mark Trozzi is another. Both are very well connected across Canada and yet neither even whispers about uniting our rank-and-file. Kuntz and Trozzi are preoccupied with their petty turf wars (e.g. NCI, VCC) that will predicatably achieve little and go nowhere. Very simply, Kuntz and Trozzi have no numbers, no resources, no reach and no muscle.
The Cabal has been around for at least a 1000 years. What that means is we little people have lost every round to the Cabal over the past 1000 years. Let the implications of that sink in with regards to what we are NOT doing now.
The purpose of this post is to educate those who do not yet know about the legislative process , about how it works and where they can find out more about the bills before Parliament. It is written to encourage journalists and news followers to take the next step when it comes to their duty as citizens to provide feedback and direction to lawmakers - given officials are supposed to be elected to represent citizens. This is not the best spot to discuss strategic planning among citizen groups who are already informed about how bills are turned into laws. What is not helpful is naming and shaming those citizen action group leaders who are working hard at what they see as a gap in the Canadian citizen rights/freedoms/health movement. While Ian has a point, that together Canadians can have more impact working for change than alone, insisting that leaders of existing groups drop everything to create a street army and naming/shaming those who are staying within their domain of expertise is polarizing instead of unifying. Too many Canadians recall with horror how brutally the federal government clamped down on participants in the Trucker Convoy in 2022, and how many other times the governent uses state force to push out any forms of economic competition. https://canadianshareablenews.substack.com/p/health-canadas-history-of-using-state. Just having seen the actions of the CFIA has been chllling as well. Currently, various individals report that their communication is already being surveillled as is. Imagine the reaction of surveiallance crews were to catch wind of a "street army" being organized. If any leaders were to publically try to organize some kind of resistance that would be seen as a threat to state power, they risk being rendered unable to continue in the valuable work they are currently already doing, for example realted to health freedoms. It would appear that resistance to the global technocratic state is occuring underground, not as much in the open as recommended by Ian here: https://www.virusfraud.org/winning-this-war-part-4/. Note to new readers of this post: Who would have thought, back in the 1980s when the Soviet Union was a poster child for totalitarianism that only 40 years later it is many of the so-called "free Western democracies" in which citizens are discussing how to respond to increasingly totalitarian state actions. See posts entitled "CSNews Guide to Globalsits" here: https://canadianshareablenews.substack.com. And follow ByGeorgeJournal on Substack as Niagara journalist Chris George provides key backgroud information for consideration.
Hello Hannah,
There is so much that is incorrect about your response here. I'll address a few of the points.
1) Your objective with this blog post and your substack account is admirable but futile. What is your strategy(ies), metric(s) and result(s) for reaching that objective? What is your strategy for reaching “𝘫𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘴”, what are you metrics for tracking whether or not you are making any progress, what results do you realistically expect and when will you report your results? It is reasonable to assume you have not defined them. In addition, you have no numbers, no resources, no reach and no muscle. You are competing against, and drowned out, by all our other people/groups that are clamouring to get their voices heard.
2) You wrote, “𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘤 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨”. We are not talking about strategic planning. We are only talking about the fact that we must unite to win this global war but that our de-facto leaders are NOT interested in uniting us. By the way, where do you suggest we go to talk about uniting, especially since that topic is avoided like the plague by all our de-facto leaders?
3) You wrote, “𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘱 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴...”. We are in a global war and the only way we can win this war is if we unite. Given people like Ted and Mark never even talk about uniting us or our rank-and-file then how is that suddenly a case of naming-and-shaming them? This is simply a fact. Ted and Mark, like all our de-facto leaders, have no numbers, no resources, no reach and no muscle. This too is a fact. If facts are now considered “𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨-𝘢𝘯𝘥-𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨” then we have a problem.
4) You wrote, “...𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘥𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨”. There isn’t a single person or group in Canada that is trying to unite us across Canada, let alone the world. This is the huge elephant-in-the-room point/problem that is being willfully ignored!!! If we can’t or don’t unite the everything we are doing is meaningless and pointless. To be clear, that means everything people (like Ted, Mark, you and I) are doing is meaningless and pointless.
5) You wrote, “𝘐𝘧 𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳...” That is the ONLY way we are going to be able to organize – in full public view. There is no “𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥” resistance for the simple reason the ONLY way to win this war is to unite, organize and mobilize millions of people across Canada and billions across the world and that can NEVER happen in “𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘺”. It is absurd to suggest otherwise.
6) Why am I having this discussion in this open public forum? The answer is because this is the only place where I can have these discussions, that is, until I am blocked from commenting.
Ian Bell
www.virusfraud.org